Posts Tagged ‘health fascists’

Off the Wagon

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

I haven’t had a (proper) drink for nearly six weeks. This might seem like an April fool — but it isn’t, it’s the absolute truth. Not a single drop of alcohol has passed my lips since the 20th February. This was loosely based on a Lenten fast but, for various reasons, mainly connected with it not being a religious observance, I started 4 days late and I’ve decided that I’ll finish 3 days early to co-incide with the change of month. Even so, this is by far the longest period of abstinence I’ve had since I was about 16 — and it might seem particularly odd given the beery posts on this page and the publication in the new ‘Swan Supping’ (out today) of a Charlie Mackle authored article on ‘The Beer Diet’.

Part of the reason I did this was to try and prove the null hypothesis as they do in scientific experiments (or is it disprove, I’ll need to sort that out before I write up my MSc dissertation?). The hypothesis is that, according to the government propaganda, one should feel a whole lot better when  the evil drug of alcohol isn’t coursing through one’s veins. I think it takes about two weeks to absolutely remove all traces of alcohol so I’m completely free of it. Do I feel a whole lot better and healthier — no, not really.

My initial impression is that that there’s not much difference in health benefits between 2 days and a month off beer — you feel the same. Certain things are different, like sleeping patterns. It’s very easy to rely on drink to knock you out into a deep sleep but I’ve still snored and fallen asleep in front of Match of the Day while sober, though maybe not as much. I’ve lost nowhere near as much weight as I thought I’d do but I wonder if that’s because I’m more permanently hydrated — that I’m now carrying round a more even amount of water rather than dehydrating and rehydrating myself? However, there’s definitely a tendency to go for biscuits and similar to replace the alcohol-related calories. Just at the end of the five weeks I’ve noticed a few other minor niggles appear to reduce that had stayed constant during the abstinence so it may be that a really extended period has some benefits.

And one beneficial effect on me has been quite indisputable — blood pressure.  It has definitely come down. I just went to the doctors so they could record my proudly lower figure on their records, although it hadn’t been bad before then.

One valuable part of the experience is I’ve proved to my own satisfaction, and given evidence to anyone who’s sceptical, that I have no compulsion to have a drink — but I think I knew that anyway. Even so I was surprised how little I’ve been tempted. I think that may be largely due to the time of year — no big social occasions or beer gardens beckoning in the summer. Nevertheless, I’ve probably saved a lot of money and it can’t have done me any harm so I may well do it again next year — and I think I’ll certainly cut back on drinking out of habit.

But this afternoon I’m going to go out and enjoy myself and get pissed.

A Welcome Report Against the Tide

Monday, March 8th, 2010

The tide of scare stories in the press about alcohol has been temporarily stemmed by reports, first mentioned in the Sunday Times, of a study in Boston (the US one) that suggested that alcohol isn’t actually as fattening as commonly assumed — for women anyway. Alcohol contains a lot of energy and it had been assumed that any excess in the body was converted into fat, as with any other foodstuff. However, it’s now hypothesised that regular drinkers’ livers process energy from alcohol in a more complex way than previously thought and that much excess energy is turned to heat, not fat. So the argument goes that alcohol is not as fattening as its calorie count might suggest.

A couple of pieces of anecdotal evidence might support this. One is that while there are many CAMRA types who have large beer bellies, they’re probably not as large as their calorie intake might lead one to believe. A moderately heavy ale drinker might drink twenty pints a week — at a couple of hundred calories a go that’s four thousand extra calories — almost the equivalent of two days worth of energy for an adult male — or about 15 Mars bars a week. Most drinkers in this category take a surprisingly long time — several years — to develop a belly. I’ve also been on an alcohol reduction drive recently and have expected the weight to fall off. Even allowing for my new found substitute of chocolate digestives, I’ve not seen my weight plummeting to the extent that the shortfall in calories might suggest. And also there are plenty of women wine drinkers, as the study suggests, who aren’t anorexics but don’t put on the vast amounts of extra weight that the calorie content alone of the wine might suggest.

However, I don’t subscribe to the point of view that’s current in some drinking circles that beer is entirely unfattening and it’s the fondness for curries and takeaways that it creates which is wholly responsible for bellies.

This article in the Daily Mail summarises the various healthy effects that have been scientifically proven for a number of drinks — from red wine to beer via Baileys, gin, cider and others. It has to be added that the overall negative health effects of alcohol aren’t included but these generally tend not to be pronounced at moderate levels anyway. Beer is revealed as being a particularly nutrient-rich drink, with four pints giving an adult’s complete daily intake of folate.  There’s even a study that purports to dismiss the causative effect of beer on large bellies.

Health Fascist Iconography

Sunday, November 29th, 2009

I just spotted this pernicious little symbol on the back of a bottle of Banrock Station wine. I suppose it could be advising overweight females not to consume the contents but is probably more likely to target pregnant women.  This seems like the start of a slippery slope in which producers of alcohol try to appease the health fascist lobby. As far as I’m aware there is only really conclusive medical evidence that heavy drinking in pregnancy is of any risk to health and the main risk period anyhow is right after conception when the foetus is developing rapidly. That is usually before a woman knows she’s pregnant so the little symbol would be better targeted at women wanting to conceive (or, conceivably women who aren’t intending to conceive but who might do so by accident) — I’m not sure a suitable symbol for that could be put on a wine bottle, though.

Stigmatism

Stigmatism

This is really stupid tokenism — a useless gesture made to exclude what is likely to be thought to be a conveniently small group of people from consumption of a perfectly legal product — and one that’s completely safe if drunk in moderation by anyone. Any woman who’s trying to conceive a healthy child is going to be aware that she shouldn’t get completely plastered — and even if she wants to then a little symbol on the bottle is not going to stop her — she’s bought the bottle by then.  The only purpose behind this is some misguided PR on the side of the wine producer.