Posts Tagged ‘calories’

A Welcome Report Against the Tide

Monday, March 8th, 2010

The tide of scare stories in the press about alcohol has been temporarily stemmed by reports, first mentioned in the Sunday Times, of a study in Boston (the US one) that suggested that alcohol isn’t actually as fattening as commonly assumed — for women anyway. Alcohol contains a lot of energy and it had been assumed that any excess in the body was converted into fat, as with any other foodstuff. However, it’s now hypothesised that regular drinkers’ livers process energy from alcohol in a more complex way than previously thought and that much excess energy is turned to heat, not fat. So the argument goes that alcohol is not as fattening as its calorie count might suggest.

A couple of pieces of anecdotal evidence might support this. One is that while there are many CAMRA types who have large beer bellies, they’re probably not as large as their calorie intake might lead one to believe. A moderately heavy ale drinker might drink twenty pints a week — at a couple of hundred calories a go that’s four thousand extra calories — almost the equivalent of two days worth of energy for an adult male — or about 15 Mars bars a week. Most drinkers in this category take a surprisingly long time — several years — to develop a belly. I’ve also been on an alcohol reduction drive recently and have expected the weight to fall off. Even allowing for my new found substitute of chocolate digestives, I’ve not seen my weight plummeting to the extent that the shortfall in calories might suggest. And also there are plenty of women wine drinkers, as the study suggests, who aren’t anorexics but don’t put on the vast amounts of extra weight that the calorie content alone of the wine might suggest.

However, I don’t subscribe to the point of view that’s current in some drinking circles that beer is entirely unfattening and it’s the fondness for curries and takeaways that it creates which is wholly responsible for bellies.

This article in the Daily Mail summarises the various healthy effects that have been scientifically proven for a number of drinks — from red wine to beer via Baileys, gin, cider and others. It has to be added that the overall negative health effects of alcohol aren’t included but these generally tend not to be pronounced at moderate levels anyway. Beer is revealed as being a particularly nutrient-rich drink, with four pints giving an adult’s complete daily intake of folate.  There’s even a study that purports to dismiss the causative effect of beer on large bellies.

Beer Better for You Than Food?

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

Well, in this particular case, I picked up a leaflet from the Moon on the Square in Feltham last night with the nutritional breakdown of everything on Wetherspoons’ menu (there’s a version on line). The large mixed grill Dave Roe had in Shrewsbury was 1885 calories, 168% GDA of fat, 211% GDA of Saturated Fat. It was the most fatty and second most calorific item on the whole menu. So in his case all the beer that he consumed throughout the day probably had less calories than the food. My ham, egg and chips was 683 calories.

Units of Usefulness

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

Researching a special diet article I’m thinking of writing I came across a most useful tool on the Drinkaware website. It calculates both how many units and how many calories you’ve consumed from various alcoholic drinks. There are quite a number of named drinks to choose from and generic categories. It’s well worth a try. Click here to access.

 I’m fairly clued up about how many units are in an alcoholic drink (one of the very few in the country I suspect) but I’m a bit hazy on the calories, except there’s usually more than you think.

There’s even an option to keep a drinking diary. I wonder some people would publish that on Facebook? I wouldn’t register that sort of thing on line as I suspect the governement and BMA would hack into it and feed it straight through to my GP’s surgery. (I wonder if having the GPs berate you for admitting getting close to the 21 unit limit is a way of putting people off going to see the doctor and so relieve strain on the NHS?)

When I was about 25 my drinking mates and I did a similar thing using little pieces of card to keep the drinking diary. We probably under-recorded a bit as we mainly drank pints of around 5% and counted them as 2 units (they’re closer to 3). I usually trundled along at somewhat higher than the supposed danger limit but my colleagues often went into triple figures and it was a matter of pride who achieved the highest. A certain Kerryman managed well over 150 one week and that’s just the beer he could remember.

Of course, this goes to point out the ridiculously unscientific basis on which the guidelines are issues. An otherwise healthy, 6ft Gaelic football player in his twenties is not going to react the same way to an amount of alcohol as a 4ft 9in 80 year old grandmother. But that’s a different rant…